Context of Slavery in the Bible

© Nicholas Moore. Powered by Blogger.

Translate

Sunday, March 28, 2021

 

Does the Bible endorse slavery?

What I find most disturbing is when misinformation is spread on a wide scale and accepted by so many as true. Ignorance, well willful ignorance is to blame. People are prone to being lazy thinkers and choose to follow whatever an authoritative figure on their side deems to be true, instead of investigating the claims for themselves. So, with that thought I want to address the issue of slavery in the Bible. Too often I see memes like this one posted by people ignorant on the subject saying something silly like, “If your Holy book tells you how to treat slaves your holy book is disqualified as a source of moral code.” Every ancient religious text has some mention of slavery because all ancient cultures practiced some form of slavery. My first question is, would you rather instead of the Bible instructing on how the indentured servant should be treated with respect and love the text taught the servant should be treated as a sub-human and viewed as property? What is the problem? Why the misunderstanding? You know the answer, it's one word, ignorance. Considering the history of the human rights movement if the Bible was such a great source for endorsing slavery why would Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. cite the Bible as his number one source for arguing against segregation and arguing for equal rights, alongside the constitution?

Summary showing the context of slavery in the Bible.

While the first mention of slavery was a curse in response to a sin Ham committed, clearly slavery was not a part of God's original plan for creation.[1] In the context of the Old Testament for the Israelite people to be a slave meant a contract to serve another until the next sabbatical year to make amends for an outstanding debt (Exo. 21:1-6 NIV).[2] This was not slavery in the traditional manner modern readers might imagine. This kind of slave was not viewed as simply a lesser person and a piece of property. Socially a slave in this context would be a fully equal image bearer of God, and not a possession, but someone who respectfully is making amends for their debt.[3] From a theological standpoint the reason God does not and would not condone the more traditional view of slavery is because humans were made to serve God not man. To even serve God one must do so freely or remain a slave to sin. Thus, not surprisingly the true origins of slavery are rooted in sin. As Stephen Cowan observed about how the Bible presents God's will for the world most certainly, "God did not make the world for slavers and sexists."[4] In the Old Testament readers see the Israelites were supposed to remember how God saved His people from slavery, and accordingly the Israelites were to treat the outsider and those less fortunate with compassion (Lev. 25:38, 42, 55; Deut. 15:15).[5] Israel was reminded by God that because of His grace she was saved and not because of their righteousness, and so accordingly these people were called to be compassionate to those in need and a blessing to the outsider.[6] Nowhere in the Old Testament or the New do readers find any God given justification for enslaving another human being, most certainly not in the sense as humans were once enslaved in America. In context the Bible makes clear that one is not intended to remain in slavery. Slaves who become believers are to find their identity in Christ and not be worried about their slavery, though if they can get their freedom they should do so (1 Cor 7:21). The Lord has set them free to serve others for Christ (1 Cor 7:22), and those who have been bought by Christ should “not become slaves of men” (7:23).[15] Along these lines, Paul calls on Philemon to receive Onesimus back no longer as a slave but as a brother (Phlm 16). Since slavery was no part of God’s good, created order, Paul’s instructions to Philemon provide an example of how relationships within the family of God can overcome evil with good.[7] You see the indentured servant is to be set free by the Christian and accepted as a brother. If an atheist wants to bring up the issue of slavery in the Bible, the Old Testament in particular, the apologist needs to be prepared to explain there is a significant difference between how surrounding cultures inhumanely viewed slaves and the Biblical view. 

Bibliography

Copan, Paul. Is God a Moral Monster?: Making Sense of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2011.

Hamilton, James M. “Does the Bible Condone Slavery and Sexism?” In Defense of the Bible: A Comprehensive Apologetics for the Authority of Scripture, ed. Steven Cowan and Terry L. Wilder, 335-347. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2013.



[1] James M. Hamilton, "Does the Bible Condone Slavery and Sexism?" In Defense of the Bible: A Comprehensive Apologetics for the Authority of Scripture, ed. Steven B. Cowan and Terry L. Wilder, 335-347, (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing, 2013), 341.

[2] Unless otherwise noted, all biblical passages referenced are in the New International Version (Indianapolis, IN: Zondervan, 1990).

[3] Ibid., 342.

[4] Ibid., 336.

[5] Paul Copan, Is God a Moral Monster? Making Sense of the Old Testament, (eBook, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2011), Chapter 7, “The Bible's Ubiquitous Weirdness?”

[6] Ibid.

[7] Hamilton, "Does the Bible Condone Slavery and Sexism?" 343.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

We Are Nicholas Moore

We Are Nicholas Moore
A symbol can be immortal.

Popular Posts

We Are Nicholas Moore

We Are Nicholas Moore
"As a symbol, l can be incorruptible." David S. Goyer

About Me

The shared vision for all of us here at Moore Enterprises: "The united; the new republic. They had everything in common, and they lived a balanced life. Selling their possessions and goods, to give to their brothers and sisters who were in need; for no one would be without. Each member felt peace and lived a comfortable life, growing together in a prosperity more valuable than simply material wealth. Every day they met together and taught each other, growing in wisdom, and love. No one was intimidated by the other, but instead each recognized what their brothers' and sisters' had to offer for the tribe. They encouraged each other, and their children grew up much the same; stable in all key areas and seeing no sense in discrimination. They broke bread and ate together in their homes, which they all helped manage when there was need. There was peace of mind, for no one lived in excess and all were provided for. Their foundation was strong; their new beginning and their future was bright and new. Because of their generosity, their prosperity multiplied... Their numbers grew daily; those who were saved from the past generations greed..."

We Are Nicholas Moore

We Are Nicholas Moore
“Every natural fact is a symbol of some spiritual fact.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Followers