"They don't like what they see, so they'll keep at it till they do... or
till they can fabricate something without the public noticing. They
don't like what science is showing them now because if something travels
faster than the speed of light then cause and effect as we know these to
be is obsolete; and this doesn't make much sense. If the laws of science
can be broken, like in the recent case where a comet went through the
atmosphere of the sun and came out intact, then one must ask if we're in
a simulated reality, and is there an intelligent designer who has the
ability to change the laws of science and nature, as easily as changing
a computer program."
Consul Nicholas Moore
If other experiments like MINOS and T2K also measure neutrinos traveling
faster than light, it doesn't rule out that an error no one thought of
is plaguing all the experiments. However, it makes the likelihood of an
error much more remote, Roser said.
"I don't know which I'm rooting for," Roser told LiveScence. "If three
or four different experiments around the world see the same thing it's
hard not to be convinced."
For evidence that sometimes shocking results are true, Bertolucci
pointed to the famous 1887 experiment by Albert Michelson and Edward
Morley that disproved the notion, popular at the time, that the universe
was filled with a medium that carries light called an ether.
"They found a result totally incompatible with the present theory of the
time, but they were right," Bertolucci said. "We have to just keep an
open mind."
Please read complete article at link provided-
http://news.yahoo.com/answer-shocking-faster-light-particles-expected-so
on-190010031.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment